Blog

Platform and Industry updates

  • 03/11/2025

    Securitized Asset Funds…

    When most people in the US private funds industry think of Form ADV – the uniform form used by investment advisers to register with both the SEC and state securities authorities – they’re most likely thinking of hedge funds, private equity funds, and venture capital funds. They might even be thinking of private credit funds - although this is not technically an option on the form itself (time for an update, perhaps?) and so these products often appear in the ‘Other private fund’ category.

    The point is, they’re less likely to be thinking of Securitized Asset Funds – those whose “primary purpose is to issue asset backed securities and whose investors are primarily debt-holders.”

    The reason is probably because most private fund managers don’t offer these products. A look at 9AT suggests that out of almost 13k private fund managers reporting to the SEC, only 247 have securitized asset funds reported on their ADV’s.

    Relative to two other large private fund categories, hedge funds and private equity funds, the number of securitized asset funds lags far behind. There are currently a total of 3,286 securitized asset funds in our database, as reported on ADVs; 105 of them first appeared in 2025 filings, thus far. Compare that with hedge funds - 22,792 in our database, 1,347 from 2025 filing s- and private equity - 40,812 in our database, 1,464 from 2025 filings.

    It’s clear, then, that these funds are a smaller part of the private fund market – at least, from a quantity perspective.

    However, on average, securitized funds tend to be larger in size. Cost is a significant reason why securitized funds are larger. Collateralized Loan Obligations (CLOs) – which make up a good chunk of the market - need to be significantly larger than the average private fund in the U.S. due to the substantial fixed costs associated with structuring, issuing, and managing these vehicles. Unlike a basic equity hedge fund, for example, which can be launched with a relatively lean operational setup - typically requiring capital for legal structuring, regulatory filings, a Bloomberg terminal and initial marketing - a CLO involves extensive securitization processes, credit ratings, and ongoing compliance requirements. Key costs include legal fees for structuring complex tranche-based securities, arranger fees paid to investment banks that structure and distribute the CLO, and rating agency fees to assess the creditworthiness of the different tranches. Additionally, CLOs incur trustee and administrative costs, collateral management fees, and audit expenses, all of which contribute to a higher operational break-even point compared to a lean equity hedge fund.

    The size required to launch a securitized fund significantly reduces the pool of asset managers who might launch these products. Indeed, you look at the sponsors, you see a ‘who’s who’ of private fund managers. In this year’s filings, KKR, Schroders, Cheyne Capital, Onex Credit Partners, Goldentree Asset Management, Cerberus Capital Management, Oaktree Capital, Bain Capital have all issued securitized asset funds, according to 9AT.

    So, which firms service these products? CLOs aren’t required to take on an auditor. However, custodians and administrators - more commonly referred to as trustees and collateral administrators - are the main service providers vying for business.

    Of the new ones in 2025 filings, 37 securitized asset funds did not list an admin provider, US Bank leads the pack so far this year with 19, as can be seen from Table 1 below. Citi moved to #2 with 12 funds. Interestingly, the firm did not feature at all on the list of top 3 admins for newly issued funds in 2023 or 2024.

    What is apparent from the data is that US Bank has consistently led the pack in the last few years.

    Table 1 – Top 3 Administrators of newly reported Securitized Asset Funds, by year by fund count

    Administrator 2025 Administrator 2024 Administrator 2023 
    US Bank 19 US Bank 83 US Bank 89 
    Citi 12 Computershare 44 BoNY 34 
    FIS Global 7 BoNY 28 FIS Global 32 

    The custody side (aka trustee) also sees US Bank off to an early lead this year, as it led in both 2024 and 2023. And, similarly to the administrator category, Citi and BoNY have a significant presence here as can be seen in Table 2 below, as does Computershare, which, while not yet appearing in the top three this year, has done so last year. Citi placed fourth last year by fund count.

    Table 2 – Top 3 Custodians of newly reported Securitized Asset Funds, by year by fund count

    Custodian 2025 Custodian 2024 Custodian 2023 
    US Bank 25 US Bank 116 US Bank 117 
    Citi 22 Computershare 55 Citi 55 
    BoNY 14 BoNY 48 BoNY 50 

    The securitized funds market is a fairly small one in terms of the broader private funds industry, and there is significant concentration in it. Of the 3,977 private funds reported so far in 2025, with a total GAV of $351bn, the 105 securitized asset funds represent only 2.6% of the quantity and 8.7% of the total GAV reported thus far in 2025. And those 105 funds are managed by just 34 advisers.

    Looking at the tables above, the key service providers to these funds are themselves larger firms, which is perhaps little surprise when considering the corresponding size of typical securitized funds and the asset managers running them.

    And, while the custodian category seem to be reasonably consistent in terms of the firms that feature towards the top of these league tables, the administrator category could be where this market sees movement in 2025. We’ll be keeping an eye on this space to see what happens!

    Editor's Picks:

    Read more

  • 02/12/2025

    In-Person Networking Remains Essential for US Private Funds Industry

    The lockdowns initiated at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic five years ago impacted our market significantly. Investor relations professionals had to try and raise money over video conference technology like Zoom and service provider sales reps – who need to meet potential clients personally as well - had to do business digitally also.

    And adapting to working at home was, at first, challenging, until the ‘new normal’ (remember that term?) became…just normal.

    Working from home is now a feature of our industry (and many others). But the pandemic was, for many industries, not only the private funds space, a test of the value of the in-person connection.

    It is a test that the in-person interaction won, and did so handsomely.

    Like many others in the private funds industry, we at 9AT are largely settling back into working normality after being in Miami at the end of January for the Uncorrelated conference, at which we enjoyed not only seeing so many of our current clients but connecting with new faces from across the spectrum of our industry – allocators/investors, private fund managers and service providers alike.

    For those of you that attended - we hope you found the events worth your time. We certainly did – catching up with clients and making new connections, whether they be potential customers or those we can help in other ways, such as referrals.

    What struck our team most about the events wasn’t its scale – we expected a good turnout, and a good turnout was delivered – but it reminded us just how important networking and relationships are to our industry.

    But something has changed since the Covid-19 pandemic. For many years pre-pandemic the fund managers and service providers made up the majority of the attendees at the myriad of industry conferences in our space.

    But what we noticed in Miami is that more allocators/LPs seem to be making the trip to the sunshine state to meet potential new managers and make new connections.

    That trend is one that we have heard anecdotally from others in the market as well. And while there are many benefits of doing so – nice weather and networking with other allocators/investors (who could be a future employer..!) being just two – it speaks to the value that more allocators/investors see in more face time with their managers.

    Previously, many LPs would spend significant amounts of time in the initial due diligence phase before making an allocation, and then face time would decrease significantly – sometimes, only at the fund manager’s annual investor meeting (if they attended it at all). Now, investors are deliberately seeking out their managers when going to events, or on the road conducting due diligence on a different manager.

    Managers are telling us that there is a similar trend happening in the pre-allocation phase. Getting on a ‘watch list’ again involved significant due diligence hours for both the manager and the LP, and then anything in-person after that would be rare, unless the LP was gearing up to make an investment. These days, the money is much more willing for a manager to just stop by their office when in town for something else.

    That doesn’t mean that things like video technology is a flash in the pan. Have you noticed how much you do video calls as opposed to phone calls now? And there are plenty of meetings that can happen digitally.

    But the post-pandemic US private funds industry is showing just how important in-person networking is to our space, whether that be investors, managers, or service providers. Here at 9AT we are fortunate to have customers from across the spectrum of the private funds industry, and we look forward to seeing you – in person – at a future event.

    P.S. – A quick observation about the Miami conference scene generally. Obviously this was the first year that MFA and iConnections partnered up on their event, which was at the Miami Beach Convention Center, as opposed to the Fontainebleau. Some folks we spoke to thought that while the conference was good, they preferred it in the hotel as there would be less time spent in a cab and more time at the events. It will be interesting to see what they do next year. And we’re a little biased as a sponsor, but we thought the Uncorrelated event, as we mentioned above, was great, and even more so given it was their first year. For those of you that we saw there, we hope that you liked the 9AT baseball caps…

    Editor's Picks:

    Read more

  • 01/14/2025

    Mixed Bag for Private Fund Fundraising in 2024

    Are you an optimist or a pessimist?

    If you consider yourself the former, and you had gone through the Form D filings in 2024, you would be feeling pretty good about the state of the private fund fundraising space. After all, there were 21 more Form D documents filed with the SEC 

    last year (15,248) than there were in 2023 (15,227). That is an increase of 0.00% to two decimal places, but a win is a win, as they say.

    If you are a pessimist, then you would look at the aggregate gross asset value (GAV) and tell people that things are bad. And, from a data perspective, you would be right – the total GAV fell from $325.5bn in 2023 to $266.01bn last year, a drop of -18.28%. You would also likely point out that the total GAV was $485.08bn in 2022, so 2024 delivered a second consecutive year of declines.

    The Form D provides private fund advisers with four sub-category options for ‘pooled investment funds’ – hedge fund, private equity fund, venture capital fund, and other investment fund.

    Each of these categories has evolved into its own industry, managing billions of dollars of investor capital across numerous geographies and asset classes. So, at the filings level, there was a noticeable uptick in activity in the hedge fund and private equity fund categories and on the other side, a decline in venture capital funds , as can be seen in Table 1 below.

    Table 1: Number of Filings by Form D Category, 2024 vs 2023

    CategoryFilings (2022)Filings (2023)Filings (2024)2024 v 2023 Change (%)
    Hedge Fund1,3901,0861,1909.6
    Private Equity Fund4,4463,6294,10413.1
    Venture Capital Fund9,0796,5466,051-7.6
    Other Investment Fund4,3902,6162,585-1.2
    Other*1,8701,3501,318-2.4
    Total21,17515,22715,2480.1

     *Other represents Form D funds that weren't marked as pooled investment funds in Section 4

    Alas, it is not the same story at the GAV level. Interestingly, venture capital funds delivered the year’s good news story in terms of total dollars raised, seeing an increase of 27.6% from last year, implying less in number but a much larger average fund size. And the private equity cohort added a couple of percentage points, as shown in Table 2.

    Table 2: Aggregate GAV by Form D Category, 2024 vs 2023

    CategoryGAV (2022)GAV (2023)GAV (2024)2024 v 2023 Change (%)
    Hedge Fund57.1387.1247.94-45.0
    Private Equity Fund165.8095.1297.392.4
    Venture Capital Fund135.4726.6233.9627.6
    Other Investment Fund109.78108.6376.93-29.2
    Other*16.907.999.8022.7
    Total485.08325.50266.01-18.3

    *Other represents Form D funds that weren't marked as pooled investment funds in Section 4

    The GAV for hedge funds fell significantly, however. In 2023, total GAV was $87.12bn, so hedge funds raised only slightly more than half that last year.

    Reasons for the struggles in hedge fund land are well documented. Rightly or wrongly, their returns are often compared to the S&P 500, which in 2024 gained approximately 25%. Add to that the recent higher interest rate environment dampening appetite for products that, on average, delivered 7.99% at the time of writing (according to BarclayHedge) and it becomes clear that the hedge fund industry faces competitive challenges.

    The numbers, however, do not paint a perfect picture of the health of fundraising in the space. Many Form D filers submit their document before they have raised any outside assets, so in these instances, the form itself shows $0 in sales. 

    So, when these funds file their Form D/A, we would expect AUM to tick up here over the next 12 months – and significantly so.

    One thing that won’t be a surprise is the dominance of private equity funds in the league tables. These products are usually larger in size than their hedge fund cousins due to the nature of the strategy, and thus provided the biggest winners again in 2024 (these products also topped the charts in 2023). Of the top 20 filings last year, 16 were private equity, two were venture capital and two were ‘other’.

    Table 3: Top Twenty Form D Filings, Jan 1 – Dec 31, 2024, by Gross Asset Value Size

    Fund NameGAV ($ billions)Type
    Linden Capital Partners VI LP4.5Private Equity Fund
    Linden Capital Partners VI-A LP4.5Private Equity Fund
    KLCP Offshore Fund IV LP4.0Private Equity Fund
    KLCP USTE Fund IV LP4.0Private Equity Fund
    KLCP Domestic Fund iv LP4.0Private Equity Fund
    Asterion Industrial Infra Fund III, FCR3.9Private Equity Fund
    Nautic Partners XI-A, LP3.8Private Equity Fund
    Nautic Partners XI, LP3.8Private Equity Fund
    Thrive Capital Partners IX Growth, LP3.5Venture Capital Fund
    Pomona Capital XI (Offshore), LP3.5Private Equity Fund
    Pomona Capital XI, LP3.5Private Equity Fund
    Columbia Spectrum Partners VI-A, LP3.2Other
    Ninety One Global Alternative Fund 2 SCSP - RAIF - Africa Credit Opportunities Fund 3A3.0Other
    Arch Venture Fund XIII, LP3.0Venture Capital Fund
    Blue Torch Credit Opportunities Fund IV LP3.0Private Equity Fund
    Blue Torch Offshore Credit Opportunities Fund IV LP3.0Private Equity Fund
    Stellex Capital Partners III-A LP3.0Private Equity Fund
    Stellex Capital Partners III LP3.0Private Equity Fund
    Sterling Group Partners VI (parallel), LP2.8Private Equity Fund
    Sterling Group Partners VI, LP2.8Private Equity Fund

    *On occasion, filers may put the same GAV on multiple filings for the same product, which can lead to double counting in certain situations

    Whether you are an optimist or a pessimist, there is something for everyone in the Form D data from 2024. And, despite the headline GAV numbers for hedge funds in particular being perhaps a little alarming, there are clearly mitigating circumstances.

    But for the private equity and venture capital set, it is difficult to argue that 2024 was not a better year than 2023. And for the private funds industry overall, the back end of last year delivered some good news in the form of reductions in the Federal Funds Rate, which, other things being equal, will hopefully drive some investors to rotate back into private funds. The aforementioned spike in the S&P 500 might also see some investors overweight US equities as well, which might also be a boon for the alternative investment industry.

    As always, we will be keeping an eye on developments.

    Happy New Year!

     

    Editor's Picks:

    Read more

  • 12/10/2024

    Private Fund Adviser Employment Data Reinforces Notion of Haves, Have Nots in US Investment Fund Industry

    The U.S. economy added 227,000 jobs in November, according to the latest jobs report from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics published on December 6. Total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 227,000 in November, and the unemployment rate changed little at 4.2 percent.

    The news is positive for the US economy, which has seen the unemployment rate ticking up gradually over the past two years, from approximately 3.6% in October 2022 to this month’s figure.

    So, we started to wonder what the jobs situation is like in the world of private investment funds. On Form ADV, the Securities and Exchange Commission requires advisers to submit the number of employees that an investment adviser has in total, as well as those providing investment advisory services specifically.

    We collect this data here at 9AT, and the news is better for the private fund folks than it is for the larger population. 

    We took data from the last six years and separated it into octiles based on assets under management. As can be seen from the tables below, some trends are apparent. 

    First is that advisers in the upper octile are adding headcount over time across the organization. As can be seen in Figure 1 below, the average headcount for advisers in the uppermost octile was 120 in 2018 and is 139 this year, an increase of 15.8%. Indeed, the average headcount has increased every year for this cohort, with the lone exception of 2021. 

    They’re also managing much more money: The mid-point AUM of this cohort was $2.421trn in 2018, and is $3.957trn this year, representing a 63.4% increase. 

    The story is different, however, for the rest of the groups. While octiles 5, 6 and 7 are showing slight decreases, the bottom two octiles – or, quartile, rather – is showing a slight decrease, meaning that the average smaller investment manager is doing more with less. In 2018, the mid-point AUM for this cohort was $52.66bn, and was $59.45bn this year, an increase of less than $7bn or 12.9% in the last six years. 

    Figure 1: US Investment Advisers, Number of Employees, by Year 2018 - 2024

     EMPLOYEES
     Octile
     12345678
    201896810142243120
    201985810132144122
    20208589132043125
    20218589122138124
    20228579122039129
    202376810122042132
    202475810132040139

     

    It’s a similar, if not perfect, correlation when comparing the overall employee numbers in Figure 1 above to the investment advisory-only numbers in Figure 2 below. 

    Two data points immediately come to mind here. First is that again, the upper octile is the only one where headcount has been added over the past six years: 65 people versus 53, an increase of 22.6%. But in the bottom four octiles, headcount has remained the same or decreased slightly.  

    Figure 2: US Investment Advisers, Number of Investment Advisory Employees, by Year 2018 - 2024

     EMPLOYEES- INV ADVISORY
     Octile
     12345678
    201844568132553
    201943568122555
    202043558112557
    202143557122257
    202243457112261
    202333467112362
    202443468112265

     

    What is not clear is the desire to add headcount; that is something we will never know. But we do know that running an investment advisory firm has arguably never been as onerous as it is today.  

    But that doesn’t seem to be stopping firms from growing.  

    As can be seen in Figure 3 below, the mid-point AUM in the bottom two quartiles has risen only slightly, considering that we are working with a six-year time horizon. Investment management firms in the fourth octile are 5.5 times larger at the mid-point than those in the first octile, but are employing only 50% more staff, implying that there is a certain minimum number of employees required to run an investment firm, despite its size. 

    Figure 3: US Investment Advisors, AUM by Octile, Mid-Point

     MID POINT AUM
     Octile
     12345678
    201852,657,272129,252,408189,987,709291,335,925481,659,251930,690,7962,572,608,9902,421,594,240,995
    201951,411,179125,051,446182,258,762277,735,931462,101,621893,680,3112,412,060,1292,266,886,021,407
    202054,500,001134,994,456197,747,803299,696,221495,491,944951,960,2662,560,654,8252,859,983,982,966
    202156,514,738140,002,170206,242,997311,108,327515,223,903988,550,7602,707,264,9823,336,860,736,105
    202259,249,397149,256,278223,442,487335,974,566554,838,3631,057,299,9832,918,789,0063,900,259,606,644
    202356,513,872141,454,760211,270,179321,653,578527,899,9181,008,189,2242,775,967,5093,326,711,572,493
    202459,450,131147,155,960219,060,992332,770,965545,335,4831,049,800,5492,894,149,6393,957,071,364,389

     

    As mentioned above, launching an investment firm in this environment is challenging. Despite a handful of regulatory ‘wins’ that the private fund industry has enjoyed in 2024, the growing and evolving operational due diligence process, alongside regulatory change in the past decade, makes starting out a more costly endeavor than in years past. 

    But for those that do take the plunge, as can be seen, scaling their businesses while not having to add significantly more headcount is a very achievable goal. 

     

    Editor's Picks:

    Read more

  • 11/20/2024

    Just How Have the Hedge Fund and Private Equity Industries Fared Over the Last Four Years?

    The United States has – or, more specifically, will have, on January 20th – a new President. Republican Donald Trump returns for a second (non-consecutive) term after beating Democrat Kamala Harris in the November 5th election.

    A recent article from the Wall Street Journal suggests that private equity bigwigs have spent $231m on political donations in the recent presidential election campaign, close to the record set in 2020. So, for this month, we decided to take a look at a range of data points across the private equity corner of the private funds industry during the Joe Biden administration to see how it is faring.

    There is, of course, an elephant in the room – the Covid-19 pandemic. The impact of the initial wave of lockdowns on the population was significant. In the private funds industry, like many others, private equity management companies and their service providers had to quickly transition to a working from home environment, which impacted fundraising and deal making. The second half of 2020 and into 2021 was frenetic, as many firms were trying to catch-up from the lulls in activity in the first half of 2020, so it is arguable that the playing field was a little different in the early years of the current administration than in previous ones.

    Still, analyzing the data is interesting – at least, to us - and we decided to start with the number of new private equity funds filed using Form D. Table 1 below shows the data, with 2022 being a remarkable outlier - more than twice as many new funds were filed when compared with 2021, indeed.

    What will be interesting is to see how the final quarter of this year turns out. If October, November and December deliver numbers similar to the past couple of years, then 2024 will end up with more new funds than last year, but a much lower gross asset value. Bulls will point to the growth in the number of funds generally, bears will point to the declining GAV.

    Table 1: New Private Equity Fund Filings, January 2020 – October 2024, by Year

    YearFund TypeNumber of New FundsGross Asset ValueAverage (Mean)Q4
    2021Private Equity5,259$1,278.4$0.2431,784 / $202.9
    2022Private Equity11,764$2,565.2$0.2181,546 / $357.8
    2023Private Equity7,200$1,129.2$0.1571,576 / $184.8
    2024*Private Equity5,911$325.7$0.055 

    *2024 data is from January 1 through October 31

    But it’s not just the private equity types that have been active in this election cycle. Famed hedge fund manager Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital added his voice to the cacophony, frequently appearing on X to offer his views.

    Table 2: New Hedge Fund Filings, January 2020 – October 2024, by Year

    YearFund TypeNumber of New FundsGross Asset Value ($bn)Average (Mean)Q4
    2021Hedge Fund1,898$1,248.5$0.658632 / $112.8
    2022Hedge Fund3,333$1,040.7$0.312493 / $86.8
    2023Hedge Fund2,505$608.2$0.243583 / $162.4
    2024*Hedge Fund2,513$264.5$0.105 

    *2024 data is from January 1 through October 31

    The hedge fund space follows a roughly similar trend to their private equity cousins, albeit with subtle differences. 2024 has already delivered an increase in terms of the number of new funds filed when compared with 2023, with an entire quarter’s worth of filings still to be tallied and added.

    The eagle-eyed among you will also notice a striking similarity in the average size of fund filed. For both the private equity and the hedge fund market, the trend of the size of the aggregate gross asset value continues to fall; the average size hedge fund launched in 2024 is just $105m, down from $658m in 2021, and for private equity, it is just $55m, down from $243m three years ago.

    Does any of this have anything to do with the sitting President? Probably not. Interest rates have had the biggest impact on the private funds market in the past few years, primarily in terms of fundraising, but also in terms of deal activity in markets such as private equity, real estate and venture capital.

     And now, they’re on the way down. In September, the US Federal Reserve cut the Federal Funds Rate by 50 basis points. On November 7th, it cut them again by 25 bps, with the range now being 4.5% to 4.75% after being 5.25% - 5.50% as recently as August. Some think they will go even lower in December. Suddenly, liquid fixed income will look much less appealing, and alternative investments will benefit from rebalancing by investors.

    Added to that, we have not published returns / IRR data here. It’s obviously way too early for the private equity funds, and 9AT does not collect returns data from hedge funds.

    But what we do think is interesting is if, and how, the data above will change in the next four years (and beyond). The average size can only go so low, for example. And we would expect to see an increase in the number of new funds and the overall GAV over time, given the general upwards trajectory in demand for alternative investments.

    Time will tell!

     

    Editor's Picks:

    Read more

  • 10/16/2024

    Interest Rate Cut Not a Moment Too Soon for Emerging Managers Looking to Raise Money

    The rising interest rate environment of the past three years has had a marked impact on the private funds market, as investors pulled back from alternatives and rotated into liquid fixed income products, given the higher yield, better liquidity profile, and perceived lower risk. Consequently, fundraising has been down in alternatives generally.

    The fund of funds corner of the alternative investment world has, of course, suffered as well. These products have long touted diversification as a key reason to allocate to them, as they reduce single manager risk quite significantly, not to mention effectively outsourcing the manager due diligence function – a task that requires an enormous amount of human capital, and therefore cost – to an expert provider.

    But another critical role they play is supporting emerging talent across the alternative investment industry, whether that be the next great equities trader in the hedge fund space, or the next discoverer of tech unicorns in venture capital circles. Smaller, emerging funds are frequently too small to receive a check from an institutional investor, and, as the saying goes, no-one ever got fired for buying IBM – so, the larger, brand name managers get the cash.

    The ability to support the next generation has certainly been constrained in the past three years. As can be seen from Tables 1, 2 and 3 below, fund of fund launches have been falling. We looked at data collected by 9AT from October 1st, 2023, through September 30th this year and compared that with the same time period in 2022-2023 and 2021-2022.

    In 2023-2024, 1,487 funds of funds have been registered with the SEC, with a total gross asset value of $183.4bn; in 2022-2023, 2,437 fund of funds were registered with the SEC, worth a collective $311.2bn; and in 2021-2022, 2,923 products worth a collective $559.8bn were filed.  

    In terms of the total GAV*, that is a reduction of close to 70% in just two years. 

    Table 1: Fund of funds registered with the SEC, Oct 1, 2023 – Sept 30, 2024

    Category Total GAV Quantity 
    Private Equity Fund $104.2bn 731 
    Hedge Fund $45.2bn 263 
    Other $25.0bn 274 
    Real Estate Fund $6.6bn 127 
    Venture Capital Fund $2.0bn 84 
    Securitized Asset Fund $283.5m 7 
    Liquidity Fund $45.7m 1 
    Total $183.4bn 1,487 

     

    Table 2: Fund of funds registered with the SEC, Oct 1, 2022 – Sept 30, 2023

    Category Total GAV Quantity 
    Private Equity Fund $137.8bn 995 
    Other $108.4bn 978 
    Hedge Fund $48.3bn 208 
    Real Estate Fund $9.8bn 119 
    Venture Capital Fund $5.2bn 130 
    Securitized Asset Fund $1.7bn 7 
    Liquidity Fund $0.0m 0 
    Total $311.2bn 2,437 

     

    Table 3: Fund of funds registered with the SEC, Oct 1, 2021 – Sept 30, 2022

    Category Total GAV Quantity 
    Private Equity Fund $329.1bn 1,616 
    Other $130.7bn 588 
    Hedge Fund $64.5bn 324 
    Venture Capital Fund $20.3bn 228 
    Real Estate Fund $14.2bn 163 
    Securitized Asset Fund $1.1bn 4 
    Liquidity Fund $0.0m 0 
    Total $559.8bn 2,923 

    September 18th delivered some encouraging news, however, for the alternative investment industry, and fund of funds and emerging managers in particular. The 50 basis points cut by the US Federal Reserve, the first since 2020, could be the beginnings of the spark that the fund of funds space needs to begin to grow again.

    There are challenges, of course. A common complaint about fund of funds from investors is that the fees are too high, and they need to ensure that any managers in their portfolio that don’t meet the hurdle rate are compensated for by those that do.

    Overcoming those objections is part and parcel of running a fund of funds offering, and they will remain regardless of the prevailing interest rate environment. But it is not only the fund of funds themselves who will be hoping for an upswing in fortunes – budding Henry Kravis’s, Ray Dalio’s, and Michael Moritz’s will also have their fingers crossed. 

     

    Editor's Picks:

    Read more
Next